By Jay A. Fernandez
Let’s get this out of the way up front: In Michael Winterbottom’s “The Killer Inside Me,” Jessica Alba is pulverized, fist to face, fist to face, fist to poor pretty face, by Casey Affleck for a good three minutes or so. Until her eyes are swollen shut and part of her face has been smashed away, exposing her jaw. What one character later describes as “hamburger,” “stewed meat.”
It’s ultra-real, excruciating to watch and, in some viewers’ minds, inexcusable.
When Affleck’s sociopathic deputy sheriff, Lou Ford, does something similar to Kate Hudson’s character later in the nihilistic noir, Winterbottom and crew lost even more of the audience. Not that they walked out of the night-time premiere screening at the Eccles, mind you. They waited until the moment the lights came up for a Q&A with the filmmakers, and Winterbottom started fielding vehement criticism about the violence toward women.
First question: “Disgusting!” yelled a woman as she got up and stormed up the aisle.
Winterbottom, after a long pause: “Next question?”
Whether the film, a period noir about a West Texas deputy sheriff with dangerous sexual issues adapted from Jim Thompson’s classic 1952 novel, has any theatrical prospects turns out to be less interesting than the perennial debate the film sparks about art vs. exploitation when it comes to violence in cinema.
Does the violence work in the context of a deeper exploration of a character’s psyche, or that of society as a whole? Or is it displayed in a vacuum without any redeeming context to provide meaning to a viewer other than an indictment of their being willing to sit through it in the first place?
![]() |
Despite my own pervading interest in cinematic explorations of violence — and my admiration of Winterbottom — my experience landed in the latter category. It doesn’t help that a wildly improbable and over-the-top finale pushes the film into something more like black comedy, which in turn undercuts the purported realism of the violence earlier in the movie.
Audience members were repeatedly prodding Winterbottom during the Q&A to provide some greater meaning or backstory that would help them accept what they had just suffered through. The director protested that, as in Thompson’s novel, he wanted to explore the noir theme of “a sense of pleasure in the violence. The violence should be shocking.”
Mission accomplished.
My impression was that the post-screening discussion didn’t really help anyone make sense of the unexpected assault on their psyches. To use Affleck’s cold line from the movie: “Nobody has it comin’. That’s why nobody can see it comin’.”
The performances by Affleck, Alba, Hudson and especially Elias Koteas as a man who sees through Ford’s charming exterior, are all pretty riveting. But to what end?
The truth about “Killer” is that most of whatever attention it eventually draws will come in the form of prurient interest in its sickening brutality and its rough, S&M-tinged sex, complete with Hudson and Alba displaying their perfect bare asses to relentless belts and bruises.
Tom Bower, who plays an elderly sheriff who believes in Ford, put the film in the company of provocative movies such as “Henry, Portrait of a Serial Killer,” “In Cold Blood” and “Half Nelson,” which served up uncomfortable, realistic portraits of humans’ darker natures. To Bower, a veteran actor, the question itself is worth making the movie: “What do you feel about it?” he asked the audience at the Q&A. “Why do we sit and watch it?”
To quote one of the film’s doomed characters: “You ask an unpleasant question, bud, you might get an unpleasant answer.”



















January 25th, 2010 at 2:47 pm
The reaction to Michael Winterbottom’s new movie is STUPID. “Moralist” critics out of touch with context need to shut up. This is based on a pulp novel. Movies don’t kill people — people kill people. Learn to watch something for what it is. And since it’s so obvious that those who can’t do bitch — go ma…ke your own damn movie.
January 25th, 2010 at 4:18 pm
This film was pointless and horrible. Booooooo
January 25th, 2010 at 5:06 pm
Thanks for the spoiler warning on the plot!!
Just because you dislike a movie doesnt give you the right to ruin it for everyone else.. Aren’t you supposed to be a professional writer?
January 25th, 2010 at 8:50 pm
“Audience members were repeatedly prodding Winterbottom during the Q&A to provide some greater meaning or backstory that would help them accept what they had just suffered through.”
Greater meaning? Yeah, the sub-text is that America pre-1960 was evil and must be changed. Keep this in mind when ever you see a film or watch TV. It’ rather illuminating.
January 25th, 2010 at 10:17 pm
“…complete with Hudson and Alba displaying their perfect bare asses…”
This is a good thing.
“…to relentless belts and bruises.”
This is most definitely not. That, plus another review indicating that the deaths of *male* characters are much less in-your-face, makes it remarkably appeal-free. No wonder Jessica Alba walked out of the screening (though to be fair she could have had another reason).
January 26th, 2010 at 4:15 am
“What do you feel about it?” he asked the audience at the Q&A. “Why do we sit and watch it?”
I am a victim of sexual assault and male violence. I don’t have the privilege of being able to sit and watch this film because it would make me violently ill. It’s time to stop hiding behind the ‘art card’ and admit that this kind of film is cynically exploitative at best, and evidence of an unhealthy and deeply disturbing ‘pleasure in violence’ at worst, particularly when it comes to sexual violence against women. See pornography, from where insipid material such as this takes it’s cue. I expect more from my artists – more originality and creativity, more thought and consideration, and more ethical responsibility.
January 29th, 2010 at 10:16 pm
Hollywood just gets sicker and sicker. This movie sounds to me like a rapist’s wet dream. This directer has a few screws loose. And for Kate and Jessica? They are womenkinds worse enemy. They will do anything, ANYTHING for attention. Play strippers, or whores, and crawl on thier hands and knees through filth, just to show off how ’sexy’ they are. They are sickening. Being rich isn’t enough for these types of actresses. they have sold out all of womankind by starring in these kind of sick movies. Some times there is just right or wrong. Oh, but not in Hollywood. They all want to act like they are above RIGHT OR WRONG. But they are NOT. They just think they are, by hiding behind ‘artistic freedom”. This is why none of them can ever stay married. their egos are so huge there is no room for any one else. Hollywood is full of the most damaged people around. They are beyond sick, and they keep getting sicker. The hell with them!! I say boycott this movie!! Boycott this movie and any movie that glamourizes violence against women. You sick freaks.
February 1st, 2010 at 12:54 pm
Question for Terri:
What other movies are you referring to in which Kate Hudson and Jessica Alba play stippers and whores? Simply because I am not sure of their existence and if so I would like to give them a look! Also, I love when people demonize and call for boycotts of movies they havent even seen.
February 5th, 2010 at 5:34 pm
[...] Sundance two weeks ago, I was suffering through “The Killer Inside Me” when Koteas popped up as one of the few relatable characters [...]