By Jay A. Fernandez
The Oscar-nominations announcement is hours away — Tuesday morning at 5:30 a.m. is Go Time. (And yes, I’ll be in the office early fielding “reaction calls” in my pajamas, like every year.)
So why does it feel so anti-climactic? Just as a college degree has become devalued in the last 20 years, so winning an Oscar has become slightly devalued — for the industry viewer, anyway — as the awards season has sprung 100 new heads in recent years.
By the time we get to the Academy Awards, are there really any surprises left? Really, very few. (Click here for Gregg Kilday’s look back at 1939’s 10 best picture nominees and his analysis of how times have — and haven’t — changed.)
In 2010, the lead acting categories perhaps have some slight wriggle room, but supporting kudos are locked away for Mo’Nique (”Precious”) and Christoph Waltz (”Inglourious Basterds”). Given the momentum of the SAG Awards and the Golden Globes, Jeff Bridges (”Crazy Heart”) and Sandra Bullock (”The Blind Side”) are heavy favorites for the top slots.
Kathryn Bigelow (”The Hurt Locker”) is solid for director, especially since she was just handed the DGA Award on Saturday night. And “Avatar” (James Cameron, Jon Landau) and “The Hurt Locker” (Bigelow, Mark Boal, Nicolas Chartier, Greg Shapiro) are neck and neck for best picture. The “Locker” crew took the prize at the PGA Awards a week ago — which precedent shows does not guarantee it Oscar glory — and “Up in the Air” (Ivan Reitman, Jason Reitman, Daniel Dubiecki) has fallen out of industry graces in the last month. Could “Precious” pull an upset? Sure. But not likely.
That leaves the screenplay categories for some suspense — and Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner are a lock for adapted for their “Up in the Air” non-collaboration.
![]() |
For my money, the only real nail-biter is original screenplay. The WGA nominees, which will be decided Feb. 20, went a little haywire when they included “The Hangover” along with “Avatar” (James Cameron), “(500) Days of Summer” (Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber), ”A Serious Man” (Joel and Ethan Coen) and “The Hurt Locker” (Mark Boal).
It will be a genuine surprise if Quentin Tarantino’s “Basterds” script isn’t included in the final Oscar noms instead of the Mike Tyson-singing-Phil Collins comedy. And the screenplay for “Up” (Bob Peterson and Pete Docter) is a real possibility in the Coens or Cameron slot.
Which means, unlike the rest of the top eight categories, it’s a five- (or six-) way race, with each nominee carrying strong credibility.
Tarantino? He’s already won one for “Pulp Fiction,” but, boy, do his scripts crackle and sing.
Cameron? People rag on his dialogue, but that doesn’t sink the expansive creative vision expressed in the script.
Peterson and Docter? Four of the last five original Pixar screenplays have been nominated. And “Up’s” mostly silent first 15 minutes alone had viewers crying.
The Coen brothers? Nommed three times already and winners twice, in adapted (”No Country for Old Men”) and original (”Fargo”). “Man” may be fielding some inside-Hollywood static for its perceived stereotypical depiction of a besieged Jewish professor, but they are always contenders (because they’re fantastic writers).
Boal? New blood producing a fact-based, riveting portrait of men in battle in a film gobbling up all kinds of nominations and awards, including critics kudos for the script. (And I’d love to see a true journalist win.)
Neustadter and Weber? Well, the Academy sure does love the newcomer with the tangy genre subversion — see Alan Ball (”American Beauty”), Diablo Cody (”Juno”), Michael Arndt (”Little Miss Sunshine”), Dustin Lance Black (”Milk”), etc.
So while I’ll be glued to the nominations announcement and dutifully watching the awards show, I won’t truly be paying attention until original screenplay is on the stage. Because, let’s face it, that’s where the unpredictable magic blooms anyway.



















February 1st, 2010 at 7:40 pm
I don’t think it’s as suspenseful as you think. “500 Days,” “Hurt Locker,” “Inglourious,” “Serious Man,” and “Up” have been the frontrunners for the better part of the year.
Unfortunately, “Hangover” could take the spot of the Coens given the former’s momentum and the lack of major awards for the latter, but I hope it stays the way it is. “Avatar,” I suppose, could break in, but remember, “Titanic” wasn’t nominated for its screenplay.
February 1st, 2010 at 9:34 pm
I’ve never been a huge Tarantino fan — but there is no other movie that is more exciting, superbly directed and acted and just an all around great cinematic experience that will be looked back at for years to come — Inglorious Basterds deserves to win for best picture and best director — something Tarantino has never received and this should be his year.
Avatar’s got the box office, the hurt locker is good but it is Inglorious Basterds that is just the cinematic achievement of the year. I hope that voters take a first or second look, they will be surprised at well made it is and how not as violent as they think it might be. A worthy winner and I hope that the Academy makes the correct choice and rewards Tarantino — finally.
February 1st, 2010 at 9:57 pm
This message by “James” brought to you by the Weinstein Brothers, Inc.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:01 pm
Please, give me a break about Tarantino – his movies all do the same thing – creepy, vulgar shock. What’s so artful about this? Nada. And Hangover – more vomit – stinks to high heaven. Where’s the art or cleverness? Not there. Precious? Garbage but it’s black so it’s in. This is what’s really changed in the motion picture industry – our standards are in the gutter. Suffer in silence.
February 1st, 2010 at 10:23 pm
Completely agree with James. ‘Inglourious Basterds’ was the true visionary piece of filmmaking this year. I’d love to see it upset in the Best Picture category.
February 1st, 2010 at 11:03 pm
Tommyflorida, you are a total idiot. Precious was one of the best films of the year!! I hope Lee Daniels gets a nomination.
February 2nd, 2010 at 12:17 am
I believe The Hurt Locker is a lock to win for Best Original Screenplay.
February 2nd, 2010 at 1:01 am
Isn’t Inglorious Basterds an adapted screenplay? I mean if StarTrek was so deemed, even though it was a totally original plot, Basterds should also be an adaptation of the earlier Italian film, no?
February 2nd, 2010 at 6:17 am
Yes James, it’s pretty obvious that you are paid by the producers to write such vacuous comments. At least try to disguise it a bit next time. The Tarantino film was banal, by the way.
February 2nd, 2010 at 10:19 am
solarjetpro are you James’ girlfriend?