RIsky Logo

Posts Tagged ‘Gabourey Sidibe’

Why the best actress race is enough to make you depressed

November 17, 2009 - 2:16 am

By Steven Zeitchik

large meryl streep julie julia child amy adams review Why the best actress race is enough to make you depressed

“An Education” director Lone Scherfig recently lamented, good-naturedly, that she was tired of producers thinking of her for stereotypically female projects. “Everyone sends me scripts with these sweet stories,” she said. “I’ve done that already. I want to make a movie with chases and explosions. I want to blow things up.”

Scherfig might have a point about typecasting, but she also might consider herself lucky — at least she’s in a category in which women are finally getting their due. This awards season couldn’t be a happier time for female helmers — as many as three (Kathryn Bigelow, Jane Campion and Scherfig) could be nominated for best director. That would equal the total number of women nominated — can this be? — in the 73-year history of the award (Sofia Coppola, Lina Wertmuller and Campion, if you’re playing Trivial Pursuit).

And yet a look at a category specifically designed for women shows a different picture.

In the best actress field, there’s a single Oscar perennial (Meryl Streep, for “Julie & Julia”), some buzzed-about newcomers (Carey Mulligan and Gabourey Sidibe for “An Education” and “Precious,” respectively) and … that’s pretty much it .

cont reading button Why the best actress race is enough to make you depressed

Maybe the Gothams didn’t totally flub the ‘Precious’ question

October 19, 2009 - 11:56 pm

By Steven Zeitchik

pre1 300x150 Maybe the Gothams didnt totally flub the Precious question

We’re loathe to read too much into the Gothams, the self-proclaimed start to the awards season that doesn’t really do much to forecast the rest of that season  (though as Michelle Byrd, who runs the awards via the IFP banner, pointed out, the breakthrough actor prize tends to presage a best actor Oscar nom).

But it’s hard to avoid the big headline from today’s nominations: the conscious choice of small indies over the  year’s anointed indie, “Precious.” Three of the five nominees for best feature — “Big Fan,” “Amreeka” and “The Maid” — have collectively earned less than $1 million, which has to be the smallest total for any three best pic nominees int he history of awardsdom. It’s almost like the committee decided to return a studio volley: ‘You’re closing down the specialty divisions? Fine, we won’t nominate those films anyway.’

(As for the merits of the noms, we’ll put out there that “Big Fan” deserves attention – it was an unheralded gem out of Sundance, both a wicked satire and heartfelt portrayal of a blue-collar man who takes his sports fandom too seriously. “Amreeka” is probably a bit less deserving, and “The Maid” we haven’t seen; if you know any of the six people who have, please have them write.)

But what’s on the list is less interesting, as it often is, than what’s not — a movie that could well outearn those three dark horses and the other two frontrunners (”Hurt Locker” and “A Serious Man”) by a New York mile. That (alleged) oversight would be “Precious,” the Liongsate awards hopeful from Lee Daniels about a sad inner-city teenager brutalized by many around her.

cont reading button Maybe the Gothams didnt totally flub the Precious question

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. From Robert Osbourne to Martin Grove and the rest, THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.