RIsky Logo

Posts Tagged ‘Inglourious Basterds’

PGA names its best pictures of 2009

January 5, 2010 - 7:51 pm

By Jay A. Fernandez

Tuesday morning the Producers Guild of America announced its Darryl F. Zanuck Picture Producer of the Year Award nominees, the equivalent of its Best Picture award. Here they are:

Avatar
District 9
An Education
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire
Star Trek
Up
Up in the Air

The PGA often matches the Academy in its noms — and this year both groups expanded to ten from five — but the PGA just as often steps away from Oscar with its winner.

Like the Academy, the PGA picked “Slumdog Millionaire” and “No Country for Old Men” in 2008 and 2007. But in 2006 it chose “Little Miss Sunshine” over “The Departed,” in 2005 it chose “Brokeback Mountain” over “Crash,” and in 2004 it chose “The Aviator” over “Million Dollar Baby.”

If we compare the PGA ten to those of the Broadcast Film Critics Association, which announced its picks for the Critics Choice Awards December 14, we notice that the producers swapped in “District 9″ and “Star Trek” for the critics’ “Nine” and “A Serious Man”:

Avatar
An Education
The Hurt Locker
Inglourious Basterds
Invictus
Nine
Precious: From the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire
A Serious Man
Up
Up in the Air

Does that mean anything? Mm, maybe. “Nine” has been kind of doomed (though only a fool would ever count a Harvey film out of best picture contention), and “A Serious Man” has seemed a little too fringe.

But three science fiction films up for a best picture Oscar? I’m all for breaking with tradition, but somehow I don’t see that holding up when the final Oscar ballots are sent around.

Regardless, give or take a film, that PGA list is what the Big Night is going to look like.

What do the critics’ picks predict for Oscar? I have the answer

December 23, 2009 - 5:26 pm

By Jay A. Fernandez

Now that 21 critics’ groups have weighed in, we have the tallies for four of the top awards-season prizes — best film, best director, best screenplay adapted and original (unless the group gave a single script nod).

(Here are some of the lists: New York Film Critics Circle, Los Angeles Film Critics Association and London Film Critics Circle.)

What this means for the Oscars is (mostly) easy to divine.

MV5BMTI3MzYxMTA4NF5BMl5BanBnXkFtZTcwMDE4ODg3Mg@@. V1. SX270 SY400 1 202x300 What do the critics picks predict for Oscar? I have the answerAdapted screenplay and director have built up a solid consensus, with Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner’s adaptation of Walter Kirn’s novel “Up in the Air” nearly unanimous in the former category and “The Hurt Locker” helmer Kathryn Bigelow taking a vast majority of the prizes in the latter category. Reitman and Turner are virtual locks for the Oscar at this point, and Bigelow is looking very strong.

The critics were split down the middle on Scott Neustadter and Michael H. Weber’s “(500) Days of Summer” and Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” in the original screenplay category. Tarantino has his faithful, and his screenplays are a delight, but he’s already got one (for “Pulp Fiction”).

Neustadter and Weber, on the other hand, are total newbies and threw their own delightful twist on a worn-out genre. The Academy loves the fresh voice come Oscar night, and Diablo Cody, Michael Arndt, Sofia Coppola and Alan Ball have statuettes to prove it.

The biggest head-scratcher is best picture. “The Hurt Locker” got more votes, but “Up in the Air” is clearly the more Academy-friendly film. It has greater scope, more fun, a wider range of praiseworthy elements — and Bigelow scored director nods from groups who determined “Air” the better picture.

908767281 What do the critics picks predict for Oscar? I have the answerWhat this tells me is that the top Oscar votes will actually be split: Bigelow for director (which brings the additional crowd-pleasing factor of bestowing the award for the first time on a female director), and “Air” for picture.

This happens every few years. In 2006, Ang Lee took the prize for “Brokeback Mounatin” while “Crash” won the picture prize. In 2003, Roman Polanski took the directing honor for “The Pianist” while “Chicago” took the top prize. In 2001, Steven Soderbergh won for directing “Traffic” while “Gladiator” won picture.

But perhaps the best predictive analog for this year is 1999, when Steven Spielberg won the prize for directing “Saving Private Ryan” while “Shakespeare in Love” took the picture win. Note the pattern when these awards are split: The edgier critical pick walks away with the directing prize while the more digestible, broader, mainstream offering gets the top slot.

This year will be no different. Or do you think I’m wrong?

Full tally after the jump:

cont reading button What do the critics picks predict for Oscar? I have the answer

Critics weigh in on end-of-year kudos

December 14, 2009 - 1:38 pm

By Jay A. Fernandez

An avalanche of critics awards fell over the weekend — from Los Angeles, New York, Boston and Washington, DC — and in some areas sharpened the Oscar-race picture.

A few of the likely acting nods have begun to coalesce, namely around supporting actress Mo’Nique for “Precious” and supporting actor Christoph Waltz for “Inglourious Basterds.” George Clooney is also looking rosy as a best actor winner for “Up in the Air.” (Best actress remains a wash at moment.)

Kathryn Bigelow and her latest, “The Hurt Locker,” took several of the picture and directing awards.

I tend to eyeball screenplay awards more than the others, as the talent on display in those categories generates all the other players’ contributions. Those potential winners are starting to gel, as well.

Jason Reitman and Sheldon Turner’s screenplay for “Up in the Air,” adapted from the Walter Kirn novel, took more honors, this time from the L.A. Film Critics Assn. and the Washington DC Area Film Critics Assn. — the latter also awarded Reitman’s film picture of the year honors.

Meanwhile, the Boston Society of Film Critics gave its screenplay award to Joel and Ethan Coen for “A Serious Man.”

The New York Film Critics Assn. awarded the political farce “In the Loop,” written by Jesse Armstrong and Simon Blackwell, its prize. (A dark horse, “Loop” also got runner-up from the L.A. contingent.)

In the era of Candyland, an unlikely awards victim

November 3, 2009 - 3:42 am

By Steven Zeitchik

500 300x200 In the era of Candyland, an unlikely awards victim

Since it was introduced 70 years ago, the Academy Awards’ original screenplay category has been a breeding ground for fresh new voices, launching careers and solidifying the legacy of writers as diverse as Orson Welles, Billy Wilder and Paddy Chayefsky.

But this year the category looks as thin as a supermodel on a crash diet. The Coen brothers’ “A Serious Man,” Quentin Tarantino’s “Inglourious Basterds” and Bob Peterson’s and Tom McCarthy’s “Up” are likely near-locks for noms. That leaves two slots, one of which could go to Scott Neustadter and Michael Weber for their quirky breakup story “(500) Days of Summer,” an admirable choice.

Beyond that, it gets dicey. Vying for attention, for instance, are the duo behind the “Star Trek” update, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman, who also count cinematic tour de force “Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen” among their 2009 credits (though the Academy could qualify “Trek”  as adapted — the writers branch will meet in the coming weeks to make rule determinations that could affect pics like that one, writers branch governor Phil Robinson said in an interview.)

The field has changed pretty dramatically over the past several decades. The last time Tarantino was nominated back in 1994 he went up against Woody Allen, Richard Curtis and Peter Jackson; this go-round he could end up pitted against “The Hangover” scribes Scott Moore and Jon Lucas (most recent credit: “Ghosts of Girlfriends Past”), who also are jockeying for a spot.

cont reading button In the era of Candyland, an unlikely awards victim

Give Pitt a chance amid ‘Basterds’ ballyhoo

August 24, 2009 - 3:45 pm

By Andrew Wallenstein

Brad_pitt_poster There was no shortage of victory laps taken Monday by the main players behind "Inglourious Basterds," which exceeded expectations with a $37.6 million opening weekend. Quentin Tarantino managed to put a fresh coat of gloss on his cult status after seeing wobblier results for other recent releases (insert ironic "Death Proof" pun here). And Harvey Weinstein was also out front lauding Tarantino, preventing yet another round of nails from being driven into the Weinstein Co. coffin after a prerelease fusillade.

Both gents deserve to bask in the afterglow, but whither Brad Pitt amid all this "Basterds" back-patting?

Not to take anything away from Messrs. Weinstein and Tarantino, but Pitt deserves plenty of credit for "Basterds' " success — and he may have gained just as much they did.

"Brad Pitt Pulls Them in at the Box Office," The New York Times declared in its post-mortem, but it's a curious headline choice given that the article spends more time on the Tarantino/Weinstein angles. Same goes for the Los Angeles Times wrap-up, which focuses on how strong turnout by women may have put "Basterds" over the top — but Pitt's appeal with that demographic isn't even noted. As for men, maybe they responded to Pitt hamming it up as the loony "NAAH-tzee killer" Aldo Raine.

cont reading button Give Pitt a chance amid Basterds ballyhoo

‘Basterds’ is Twitter Age’s first true success story

August 23, 2009 - 11:42 am

By Steven Zeitchik

Pitt_basterds_blog

Finally, a Twitter effect that benefits a movie instead of hurts it.

After lukewarm tweets from Friday screenings caused weekend drops for such pics as "Bruno" and "Funny People" this summer, "Inglourious Basterds" and rode a crest of tweeting goodwill this weekend.

Quentin Tarantino's movie held fast after its $14.4 million Friday to finish at $38.1 million and, to the delight of media everywhere, provide plenty of fodder for a Weinstein victory lap.

The initial fear for "Basterds" was that filmgoers expecting a pure action movie — the movie that the Weinsteins marketed — would be disappointed and give it a thumbs-down once the pic unspooled.

That would ding the film as it played throughout the weekend — especially as the more generous Tarantino fans who rushed out to see the movie Friday gave way to more general audiences during the weekend.

cont reading button Basterds is Twitter Ages first true success story

The Hollywood Reporter is Your Complete Film Resource

The columnists and bloggers who write for The Hollywood Reporter have their collective finger on the pulse of the boxoffice. From Robert Osbourne to Martin Grove and the rest, THR columnists deliver their thoughts on the film industry in an uncompromised style. Subscribe to THR today and get the latest views from these film experts and get the latest movie reviews as well.